PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 18%Slider 14%Curveball 13%Sinker 11%Cutter 2%Changeup 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.