PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 18%Slider 14%Curveball 13%Sinker 11%Cutter 2%Changeup 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-20 game page →