PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Woodruff vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Woodruff's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Woodruff's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .232vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Sinker 25%Changeup 19%Cutter 14%Curveball 4%Sweeper 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Woodruff, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.