PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Woodruff vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Woodruff's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Woodruff's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .230vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Sinker 25%Changeup 19%Cutter 14%Curveball 4%Sweeper 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Woodruff, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .378
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .276
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-04 game page →