PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Sproat vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Sproat's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Sproat's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 20%Curveball 11%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Unknown 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Sproat, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 644 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-27 game page →