PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Sproat vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Sproat's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Sproat's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 20%Curveball 11%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Unknown 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Sproat, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .421 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.