PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Sproat vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Sproat's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Sproat's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Cutter 20%Curveball 11%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Unknown 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Sproat, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.