PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Sproat vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Sproat's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Sproat's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Curveball 12%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Sproat, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .373
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-05 game page →