PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Sproat vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Sproat's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Sproat's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 20%Curveball 11%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Unknown 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Sproat, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.