PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Pfaadt vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Pfaadt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Pfaadt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 22%Sweeper 18%Changeup 15%Curveball 11%Cutter 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Pfaadt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.