PITCHER MATCHUP

Bradgley Rodriguez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bradgley Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bradgley Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .211vs RHH xwOBA .253Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 40%Sinker 27%Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 6%Slider 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bradgley Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Changeup (40% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.