PITCHER MATCHUP

Brad Lord vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brad Lord's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brad Lord's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .360vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Sinker 21%Slider 20%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brad Lord, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 OC Owen Caissie LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .431 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.