PITCHER MATCHUP

Blade Tidwell vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Blade Tidwell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Blade Tidwell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Sweeper 30%Slider 14%Sinker 14%Changeup 4%Curveball 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Blade Tidwell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-16 game page →