PITCHER MATCHUP

Blade Tidwell vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Blade Tidwell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Blade Tidwell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .379vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Sweeper 29%Sinker 17%Slider 11%Changeup 4%Curveball 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Blade Tidwell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 KK Kyle Karros RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CC Cole Carrigg SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CN Connor Norby RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.