PITCHER MATCHUP

Blade Tidwell vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Blade Tidwell's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Blade Tidwell's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Sweeper 31%Sinker 14%Slider 13%Changeup 5%Curveball 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Blade Tidwell, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-28 game page →