PITCHER MATCHUP

Ben Brown vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ben Brown's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ben Brown's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Knuckle Curve 38%Sinker 9%Changeup 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ben Brown, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .263
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .223 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (38% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.