PITCHER MATCHUP

Anthony Molina vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Anthony Molina's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Anthony Molina's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .404vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Changeup 20%Slider 16%Curveball 14%Sinker 2%Cutter 2%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Anthony Molina, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KC Kody Clemens SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VC Victor Caratini SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-22 game page →