PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Painter vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Painter's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Painter's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Slider 19%Sweeper 15%Splitter 10%Sinker 9%Curveball 7%Changeup 6%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Painter, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 622 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 571 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-02 game page →