PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Painter vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Painter's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Painter's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Slider 18%Sweeper 16%Changeup 10%Sinker 8%Splitter 8%Curveball 6%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Painter, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.