PITCHER MATCHUP

Andrew Morris vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Andrew Morris's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Andrew Morris's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .252Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Cutter 20%Sinker 12%Changeup 11%Sweeper 10%Curveball 2%Unknown 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Andrew Morris, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CK Colt Keith LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-01 game page →