PITCHER MATCHUP

Alan Rangel vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Alan Rangel's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Alan Rangel's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Changeup 34%Slider 16%Curveball 12%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Alan Rangel, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BB Brett Baty LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JS Juan Soto LHB .382
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .429 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MV Mark Vientos RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 FL Francisco Lindor SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.