PITCHER MATCHUP

Alan Rangel vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Alan Rangel's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Alan Rangel's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Changeup 34%Slider 17%Curveball 11%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Alan Rangel, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 631 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .387
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .433 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MV Mark Vientos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.