PREVIEW Starts 2:10 PM ET · Kauffman Stadium
September 24, 2026 · AL Cent

Chicago White Sox at Kansas City Royals

September 24, 20262:10 PM ETKauffman Stadium
AWAY
Chicago White Sox
80-76
@
HOME
Kansas City Royals
67-89

Probable starters

AWAY
TBD
HOME · KC

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · CWS Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Miguel Vargas 3B · R .251 .362 .482 .844 33 88 122 .720
2 Chase Meidroth 2B · R .268 .343 .401 .744 15 58 139 .728
3 Colson Montgomery SS · L .205 .292 .419 .711 31 87 216 .752
4 Sam Antonacci LF · L .270 .363 .391 .754 8 48 81 .746
5 Munetaka Murakami 1B · L .202 .346 .463 .809 32 70 188 .733
6 Tristan Peters CF · L .272 .344 .451 .795 12 54 87 .733
7 Andrew Benintendi DH · L .242 .302 .413 .715 14 71 106 .709
8 Braden Montgomery RF · S .212 .305 .341 .646 6 38 69 .746
9 Randal Grichuk DH · R .282 .309 .548 .857 13 40 59 .716
HOME · KC Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Salvador Perez DH · R .227 .271 .374 .645 19 73 116 .713
2 Bobby Witt Jr. SS · R .279 .359 .440 .799 18 54 105 .792
3 Carter Jensen C · L .233 .319 .454 .773 25 76 165 .751
4 Jac Caglianone RF · L .282 .335 .486 .821 23 71 139 .732
5 Isaac Collins LF · S .217 .323 .329 .652 6 40 114 .726
6 Michael Massey 2B · L .274 .307 .436 .743 13 48 72 .711
7 Vinnie Pasquantino 1B · L .244 .330 .406 .736 14 54 72 .742
8 Nick Loftin 3B · R .240 .324 .380 .704 7 43 71 .717
9 Maikel Garcia 3B · R .258 .313 .371 .684 3 34 50 .730

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

KC starter vs White Sox lineup

Randy Dobnak (RHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Randy Dobnak vs White Sox: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · CWS
Will Venable
Lineup 6.0 R Bunts 3.4 R IBBs 3.2 R
HOME · KC
Matt Quatraro
Lineup 4.6 R Bunts 3.1 R IBBs 2.5 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · CWS
  • Available 4
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 1
  • Inactive 0
HOME · KC
  • Available 7
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 1

Recent form

AWAY · CWS
5-5 W2 +3 run diff
WWLWLLWLWL
HOME · KC
3-7 L4 -11 run diff
LLLLWLLLWW

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the White Sox and Royals staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.