Arizona Diamondbacks at Colorado Rockies
Probable starters
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Corbin Carroll RF · L | .240 | .331 | .470 | .801 | 22 | 72 | 147 | .771 |
| 2 Geraldo Perdomo SS · S | .256 | .363 | .367 | .730 | 9 | 52 | 82 | .754 |
| 3 Ketel Marte 2B · S | .249 | .315 | .437 | .752 | 22 | 74 | 86 | .766 |
| 4 Nolan Arenado 3B · R | .247 | .322 | .455 | .777 | 27 | 78 | 115 | .706 |
| 5 Gabriel Moreno C · R | .307 | .386 | .481 | .867 | 15 | 75 | 78 | .741 |
| 6 Ildemaro Vargas 1B · S | .254 | .297 | .380 | .677 | 9 | 67 | 47 | .696 |
| 7 Tim Tawa 1B · R | .234 | .292 | .385 | .677 | 10 | 38 | 81 | .722 |
| 8 Jesús Sánchez RF · L | .256 | .314 | .406 | .720 | 8 | 35 | 73 | .726 |
| 9 Lars Nootbaar DH · L | .237 | .339 | .376 | .715 | 7 | 31 | 64 | .723 |
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 TJ Rumfield 1B · L | .300 | .392 | .451 | .843 | 15 | 70 | 85 | .733 |
| 2 Jake McCarthy LF · L | .297 | .340 | .490 | .830 | 15 | 83 | 90 | .712 |
| 3 Hunter Goodman C · R | .245 | .312 | .528 | .840 | 39 | 82 | 172 | .747 |
| 4 Ezequiel Tovar SS · R | .215 | .262 | .339 | .601 | 11 | 42 | 125 | .738 |
| 5 Mickey Moniak LF · L | .241 | .282 | .482 | .764 | 22 | 64 | 117 | .734 |
| 6 Kyle Karros 3B · R | .258 | .353 | .420 | .773 | 12 | 48 | 91 | .735 |
| 7 Troy Johnston RF · L | .281 | .350 | .397 | .747 | 4 | 50 | 80 | .721 |
| 8 Connor Norby 2B · R | .242 | .341 | .377 | .718 | 7 | 32 | 105 | .730 |
| 9 Cole Carrigg CF · S | .271 | .335 | .461 | .796 | 10 | 48 | 83 | .742 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .325
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .334
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .327
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .292
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .314
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .319
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .317
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 CN Connor Norby RHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .309
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
Bullpen availability
- Available 5
- Limited 2
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
- Available 6
- Limited 1
- Rest required 1
- Inactive 0
Recent form
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Diamondbacks and Rockies staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.