Minnesota Twins at San Francisco Giants
Probable starters
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Brooks Lee 3B · S | .253 | .301 | .430 | .731 | 23 | 81 | 98 | .722 |
| 2 Josh Bell DH · S | .258 | .320 | .421 | .741 | 20 | 91 | 122 | .714 |
| 3 Kody Clemens 2B · L | .238 | .299 | .462 | .761 | 26 | 76 | 124 | .715 |
| 4 Luke Keaschall 2B · R | .278 | .370 | .387 | .757 | 9 | 46 | 85 | .749 |
| 5 Royce Lewis 1B · R | .227 | .290 | .381 | .671 | 14 | 54 | 123 | .732 |
| 6 Victor Caratini C · S | .222 | .315 | .316 | .631 | 7 | 44 | 77 | .713 |
| 7 Ryan Jeffers C · R | .255 | .355 | .467 | .822 | 14 | 55 | 60 | .731 |
| 8 Austin Martin RF · R | .232 | .343 | .319 | .662 | 3 | 24 | 66 | .727 |
| 9 Ryan Kreidler SS · R | .218 | .285 | .385 | .670 | 8 | 28 | 59 | .711 |
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Jung Hoo Lee RF · L | .276 | .320 | .404 | .724 | 10 | 57 | 57 | .724 |
| 2 Bryce Eldridge DH · L | .269 | .364 | .461 | .825 | 17 | 57 | 119 | .752 |
| 3 Drew Gilbert CF · L | .231 | .323 | .383 | .706 | 10 | 40 | 68 | .733 |
| 4 Christian Koss SS · R | .228 | .272 | .321 | .593 | 4 | 12 | 48 | .722 |
| 5 Drew Cavanaugh C · L | .231 | .322 | .276 | .598 | 1 | 10 | 46 | .742 |
| 6 Jonah Cox CF · R | .281 | .324 | .422 | .746 | 4 | 15 | 55 | .737 |
| 7 Osleivis Basabe 2B · R | .202 | .265 | .347 | .612 | 5 | 13 | 28 | .729 |
| 8 Shay Whitcomb 3B · R | .175 | .198 | .320 | .518 | 4 | 11 | 31 | .723 |
| 9 Victor Bericoto LF · R | .253 | .268 | .453 | .721 | 5 | 15 | 27 | .742 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 BL Brooks Lee SH .272
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
2 JB Josh Bell SH .332
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
3 KC Kody Clemens SH .325
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .294
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 VC Victor Caratini SH .300
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
8 AM Austin Martin RHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .321
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
- Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (29% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
Bullpen availability
- Available 8
- Limited 0
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
- Available 6
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 1
Recent form
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Twins and Giants staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.