PREVIEW Starts 4:10 PM ET · Chase Field
August 9, 2026 · NL West

Los Angeles Dodgers at Arizona Diamondbacks

August 9, 20264:10 PM ETChase Field
AWAY
Los Angeles Dodgers
69-46
—
@
HOME
Arizona Diamondbacks
61-55
—

Probable starters

AWAY · LAD
Justin Wrobleski
Justin Wrobleski
HOME · AZ
Eduardo Rodriguez
Eduardo Rodriguez

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · LAD Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Andy Pages CF · R .268 .332 .451 .783 18 74 98 .745
2 Freddie Freeman 1B · L .310 .385 .485 .870 15 54 78 .762
3 Kyle Tucker RF · L .243 .339 .379 .718 10 52 84 .767
4 Max Muncy 3B · L .253 .347 .494 .841 22 52 99 .733
5 Mookie Betts SS · R .233 .288 .397 .685 13 36 39 .749
6 Teoscar Hernández LF · R .255 .322 .415 .737 11 41 83 .728
7 Miguel Rojas 2B · R .283 .322 .403 .725 3 18 19 .697
8 Hunter Feduccia C · L .229 .300 .333 .633 2 12 44 .713
9 Tommy Edman 2B · S .289 .364 .438 .802 3 21 30 .708
HOME · AZ Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Ketel Marte 2B · S .248 .306 .439 .745 19 62 74 .766
2 Corbin Carroll RF · L .245 .340 .470 .810 16 53 110 .776
3 Geraldo Perdomo SS · S .242 .356 .364 .720 9 41 61 .754
4 Nolan Arenado 3B · R .241 .322 .424 .746 16 53 88 .706
5 Ildemaro Vargas 1B · S .274 .318 .413 .731 7 55 34 .696
6 Gabriel Moreno C · R .302 .384 .443 .827 8 50 54 .741
7 Lars Nootbaar LF · L .232 .337 .345 .682 3 17 41 .728
8 Ryan Waldschmidt CF · R .293 .333 .402 .735 1 13 56 .746
9 Tim Tawa LF · R .232 .282 .400 .682 6 26 38 .722

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

LAD starter vs Diamondbacks lineup

Justin Wrobleski (LHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Justin Wrobleski vs Diamondbacks: full season matchup breakdown →
AZ starter vs Dodgers lineup

Eduardo Rodriguez (LHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Eduardo Rodriguez vs Dodgers: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · LAD
Dave Roberts
Dave Roberts
Lineup 1.4 R Bunts 1.1 R IBBs 4.0 R
HOME · AZ
Torey Lovullo
Torey Lovullo
Lineup 3.6 R Bunts 3.8 R IBBs 2.8 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · LAD
  • Available 8
  • Limited 0
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 0
HOME · AZ
  • Available 6
  • Limited 1
  • Rest required 1
  • Inactive 0

Recent form

AWAY · LAD
2-8 L6 -20 run diff
LLLLLLWWLL
HOME · AZ
6-4 L1 +6 run diff
LWLWLWWWWL

Season series: 0-3 with LAD listed first across 3 prior meetings.

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Dodgers and Diamondbacks staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.

← All matchups