August 9, 2026 · NL East
Los Angeles Angels at Miami Marlins
@
Probable starters
AWAY · LAA
HOME · MIA
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
AWAY · LAA Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Zach Neto SS · R | .230 | .317 | .426 | .743 | 20 | 50 | 160 | .750 |
| 2 Nolan Schanuel 1B · L | .273 | .343 | .384 | .727 | 6 | 38 | 55 | .744 |
| 3 Mike Trout CF · R | .239 | .384 | .441 | .825 | 18 | 40 | 110 | .731 |
| 4 Oswald Peraza 2B · R | .233 | .279 | .362 | .641 | 7 | 24 | 89 | .708 |
| 5 Vaughn Grissom 2B · R | .261 | .325 | .407 | .732 | 7 | 47 | 46 | .727 |
| 6 Josh Lowe LF · L | .201 | .259 | .347 | .606 | 8 | 22 | 59 | .723 |
| 7 Moisés Ballesteros C · L | .228 | .296 | .371 | .667 | 6 | 23 | 38 | .753 |
| 8 Wade Meckler LF · L | .310 | .377 | .424 | .801 | 3 | 20 | 38 | .730 |
| 9 Denzer Guzman 3B · R | .231 | .285 | .361 | .646 | 5 | 16 | 40 | .748 |
HOME · MIA Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Otto Lopez SS · R | .318 | .351 | .474 | .825 | 9 | 51 | 64 | .719 |
| 2 Xavier Edwards 2B · S | .288 | .369 | .395 | .764 | 6 | 41 | 64 | .735 |
| 3 Jakob Marsee CF · L | .199 | .319 | .302 | .621 | 6 | 28 | 97 | .746 |
| 4 Kyle Stowers 1B · L | .232 | .317 | .453 | .770 | 16 | 48 | 123 | .739 |
| 5 Javier Sanoja 3B · R | .269 | .306 | .403 | .709 | 4 | 39 | 24 | .740 |
| 6 Heriberto Hernández LF · R | .229 | .302 | .455 | .757 | 16 | 43 | 81 | .739 |
| 7 Owen Caissie RF · L | .228 | .288 | .439 | .727 | 12 | 50 | 100 | .740 |
| 8 Joe Mack C · L | .240 | .293 | .440 | .733 | 11 | 34 | 55 | .746 |
| 9 Griffin Conine RF · L | .257 | .344 | .515 | .859 | 10 | 22 | 47 | .722 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .325
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .322
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .334
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .300
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .321
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 JM Joe Mack LHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .343
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
- Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .328
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 MT Mike Trout RHB .358
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .290
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .316
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .307
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .314
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
AWAY · LAA
Lineup 2.4 R
Bunts 1.7 R
IBBs 4.0 R
HOME · MIA
Lineup 3.3 R
Bunts 2.5 R
IBBs 0.9 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · LAA
- Available 5
- Limited 2
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 1
HOME · MIA
- Available 4
- Limited 4
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · LAA
3-7
W1
-10 run diff
WLLWLLLLLW
HOME · MIA
6-4
L3
-2 run diff
LLLWWWLWWW
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Angels and Marlins staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.