August 8, 2026 · NL East
Los Angeles Angels at Miami Marlins
@
Probable starters
AWAY · LAA
HOME · MIA
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
AWAY · LAA Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Zach Neto SS · R | .230 | .317 | .426 | .743 | 20 | 50 | 160 | .750 |
| 2 Nolan Schanuel 1B · L | .273 | .343 | .384 | .727 | 6 | 38 | 55 | .744 |
| 3 Mike Trout CF · R | .239 | .384 | .441 | .825 | 18 | 40 | 110 | .731 |
| 4 Oswald Peraza 2B · R | .233 | .279 | .362 | .641 | 7 | 24 | 89 | .708 |
| 5 Vaughn Grissom 2B · R | .261 | .325 | .407 | .732 | 7 | 47 | 46 | .727 |
| 6 Josh Lowe LF · L | .201 | .259 | .347 | .606 | 8 | 22 | 59 | .723 |
| 7 Moisés Ballesteros C · L | .228 | .296 | .371 | .667 | 6 | 23 | 38 | .753 |
| 8 Wade Meckler LF · L | .310 | .377 | .424 | .801 | 3 | 20 | 38 | .730 |
| 9 Denzer Guzman 3B · R | .231 | .285 | .361 | .646 | 5 | 16 | 40 | .748 |
HOME · MIA Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Otto Lopez SS · R | .318 | .351 | .474 | .825 | 9 | 51 | 64 | .719 |
| 2 Xavier Edwards 2B · S | .288 | .369 | .395 | .764 | 6 | 41 | 64 | .735 |
| 3 Jakob Marsee CF · L | .199 | .319 | .302 | .621 | 6 | 28 | 97 | .746 |
| 4 Kyle Stowers 1B · L | .232 | .317 | .453 | .770 | 16 | 48 | 123 | .739 |
| 5 Javier Sanoja 3B · R | .269 | .306 | .403 | .709 | 4 | 39 | 24 | .740 |
| 6 Heriberto Hernández LF · R | .229 | .302 | .455 | .757 | 16 | 43 | 81 | .739 |
| 7 Owen Caissie RF · L | .228 | .288 | .439 | .727 | 12 | 50 | 100 | .740 |
| 8 Joe Mack C · L | .240 | .293 | .440 | .733 | 11 | 34 | 55 | .746 |
| 9 Griffin Conine RF · L | .257 | .344 | .515 | .859 | 10 | 22 | 47 | .722 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .316
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .309
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .328
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .293
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .298
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 JM Joe Mack LHB .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .330
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
- Changeup (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .327
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 MT Mike Trout RHB .354
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .316
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
- Sinker (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Manager comparison
AWAY · LAA
Lineup 2.4 R
Bunts 1.7 R
IBBs 4.0 R
HOME · MIA
Lineup 3.3 R
Bunts 2.5 R
IBBs 0.9 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · LAA
- Available 5
- Limited 2
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 1
HOME · MIA
- Available 4
- Limited 4
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · LAA
3-7
W1
-10 run diff
WLLWLLLLLW
HOME · MIA
6-4
L3
-2 run diff
LLLWWWLWWW
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Angels and Marlins staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.