August 7, 2026 · NL West
Detroit Tigers at San Francisco Giants
@
Probable starters
AWAY · DET
HOME
TBD
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
AWAY · DET Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Kevin McGonigle SS · L | .284 | .391 | .431 | .822 | 12 | 44 | 69 | .755 |
| 2 Riley Greene LF · L | .276 | .367 | .459 | .826 | 16 | 54 | 127 | .766 |
| 3 Dillon Dingler C · R | .278 | .341 | .536 | .877 | 26 | 78 | 99 | .728 |
| 4 Spencer Torkelson 1B · R | .218 | .307 | .419 | .726 | 20 | 58 | 141 | .743 |
| 5 Colt Keith 3B · L | .275 | .321 | .425 | .746 | 8 | 31 | 62 | .741 |
| 6 Zach McKinstry 2B · L | .216 | .296 | .326 | .622 | 4 | 23 | 49 | .710 |
| 7 Gleyber Torres 2B · R | .268 | .385 | .404 | .789 | 7 | 29 | 51 | .729 |
| 8 Hao-Yu Lee 2B · R | .263 | .293 | .418 | .711 | 6 | 27 | 51 | .746 |
| 9 James Outman CF · L | .173 | .232 | .321 | .553 | 5 | 17 | 70 | .712 |
HOME · SF Projected · top 9 by AB
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Rafael Devers 1B · L | .248 | .322 | .474 | .796 | 23 | 62 | 129 | .766 |
| 2 Willy Adames SS · R | .221 | .279 | .408 | .687 | 18 | 47 | 129 | .729 |
| 3 Jung Hoo Lee RF · L | .303 | .338 | .449 | .787 | 8 | 43 | 43 | .728 |
| 4 Bryce Eldridge DH · L | .255 | .348 | .439 | .787 | 11 | 28 | 78 | .752 |
| 5 Drew Gilbert CF · L | .241 | .327 | .353 | .680 | 4 | 21 | 43 | .733 |
| 6 Daniel Susac C · R | .257 | .305 | .397 | .702 | 3 | 22 | 32 | .737 |
| 7 Drew Cavanaugh C · L | .250 | .364 | .268 | .632 | 0 | 4 | 16 | .742 |
| 8 Christian Koss 2B · R | .167 | .216 | .188 | .404 | 0 | 1 | 10 | .722 |
| 9 Grant McCray CF · L | .107 | .286 | .214 | .500 | 1 | 2 | 10 | .731 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .332
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 WA Willy Adames RHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .307
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .337
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
-
8 CK Christian Koss RHB .305
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 GM Grant McCray LHB .288
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
- Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (14% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Changeup (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
AWAY · DET
Lineup 4.1 R
Bunts 0.8 R
IBBs 1.2 R
HOME · SF
Lineup 2.2 R
Bunts 2.7 R
IBBs 2.9 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · DET
- Available 10
- Limited 0
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
HOME · SF
- Available 8
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · DET
6-4
W1
+51 run diff
WLWWWWLWLL
HOME · SF
4-6
L2
+1 run diff
LLWLLLWWLW
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Tigers and Giants staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.