June 25, 2026 · NL West
Oakland Athletics at San Francisco Giants
@
Probable starters
AWAY · ATH
HOME · SF
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
ATH starter vs Giants lineup
Jeffrey Springs (LHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .317
-
1 WA Willy Adames RHB .309
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 RD Rafael Devers LHB .331
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .290
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .330
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .319
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .308
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .340
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
- Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SF starter vs Athletics lineup
Landen Roupp (RHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .303
-
1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .321
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .324
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .302
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .294
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .291
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .300
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .302
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 MM Max Muncy RHB .284
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
- Sinker (38% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
AWAY · ATH
Lineup 3.3 R
Bunts 1.3 R
IBBs 1.6 R
HOME · SF
Lineup 1.7 R
Bunts 1.6 R
IBBs 1.8 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · ATH
- Available 8
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
HOME · SF
- Available 8
- Limited 0
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · ATH
5-5
L2
-13 run diff
LLWWLLWLWW
HOME · SF
4-5
L3
+2 run diff
LLL?WWWWLL
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Athletics and Giants staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.