June 23, 2026 · NL West
Oakland Athletics at San Francisco Giants
@
Probable starters
AWAY · ATH
HOME · SF
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
ATH starter vs Giants lineup
Aaron Civale (RHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .314
-
1 WA Willy Adames RHB .300
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
2 RD Rafael Devers LHB .338
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .317
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
- Cutter (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Slider (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SF starter vs Athletics lineup
Robbie Ray (LHP)
Lineup avg xwOBA .317
-
1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .334
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .352
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .324
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .304
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .288
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .306
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .293
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .323
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 MM Max Muncy RHB .331
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Manager comparison
AWAY · ATH
Lineup 3.3 R
Bunts 1.3 R
IBBs 1.6 R
HOME · SF
Lineup 1.7 R
Bunts 1.6 R
IBBs 1.8 R
Bullpen availability
AWAY · ATH
- Available 8
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
HOME · SF
- Available 8
- Limited 0
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
Recent form
AWAY · ATH
5-5
L2
-13 run diff
LLWWLLWLWW
HOME · SF
4-5
L3
+2 run diff
LLL?WWWWLL
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Athletics and Giants staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.