New York Mets vs Colorado Rockies
Starting pitchers
Box score
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| COL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Manager comparison
Both managers grade D+ / C entering this matchup.
Recent form
Season series: 2-4 with NYM listed first across 8 prior meetings.
Tactical analysis
RunsLeft separates manager decisions from player execution from game variance. Each card below is the same three-number framework that drives the share cards on the SPA replay page.
- Manager lineup cost +0.17 R/G Optimal arrangement projects 4.14 vs actual lineup 3.97
- Player execution −3.97 R/G Players fell 3.97 short of the lineup's 3.97 projection (scored 0)
- Game variance −4.14 R/G Total game outcome vs optimal expectation
Lineup spots out of order vs season production
- Manager lineup cost +0.03 R/G Optimal arrangement projects 4.17 vs actual lineup 4.14
- Player execution −4.14 R/G Players fell 4.14 short of the lineup's 4.14 projection (scored 0)
- Game variance −4.17 R/G Total game outcome vs optimal expectation
Lineup spots out of order vs season production
Optimal lineups projected 4.1 – 4.2 — actual was 0 – 0.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. Tactical analysis comes from a per-game Monte Carlo: 10,000 simulated games against the opposing starter's ERA, both for the actual lineup the manager wrote and for the optimal arrangement of those nine players. The three numbers — manager cost, player execution, game variance — separate which part of the result was the lineup, the players, or the dice.